Graeme Swann has led England's lower-order batting resistance in the
last couple of years, with an average that is untouched in their Test
history
It's often said that the resilience of lower-order batsmen is an excellent indicator of team spirit. If that's the case, England's bunch is perhaps one of the happiest going around now. Andy Flower, Andrew Strauss and several other players have often been quoted as saying that the England team is one united lot these days, and going by their lower-order displays, that certainly seems to be the case.
It helps, of course, that England have unearthed a few bowlers who are more than handy with the bat. Graeme Swann and Stuart Broad have numbers that easily put them in the allrounders' bracket: Swann has scored four half-centuries in 21 innings, in which he averages 32.81, which is more than five runs higher than his overall first-class batting average. Broad has been almost as impressive, averaging 26.34, with five fifties. Even James Anderson has improved his batting significantly over the last couple of years, averaging nearly 17 since the beginning of 2008, an improvement of 54% from his average before 2008.
All of this has meant England's average partnership for wickets seven to 10 over the last two years is an impressive 24.59, with only one team, Australia, doing better. New Zealand and South Africa, two teams who have traditionally had very strong lower-order batting strength, have slipped slightly during this period. The two teams who bring up the rear are the ones who have had the most problems with team spirit and with results, West Indies and Pakistan.
| Team | Innings | Runs | Average | 100/ 50 stands |
| Australia | 157 | 3934 | 25.71 | 7/ 15 |
| England | 148 | 3394 | 24.59 | 3/ 19 |
| New Zealand | 136 | 3144 | 24.00 | 5/ 10 |
| India | 122 | 2634 | 22.51 | 4/ 9 |
| South Africa | 104 | 2215 | 21.93 | 2/ 10 |
| Sri Lanka | 82 | 1684 | 21.87 | 2/ 6 |
| Bangladesh | 94 | 1724 | 18.73 | 2/ 7 |
| West Indies | 137 | 2455 | 18.18 | 1/ 8 |
| Pakistan | 73 | 1177 | 16.57 | 1/ 5 |
To get an indication of how much England's lower order has improved in the last couple of years, take a look at the table below, which lists the average partnerships for the last four wickets during the eight-year period from 2000 to 2007. England were in lowly eighth position, below Zimbabwe and better than only West Indies and Bangladesh. In 586 innings, only 51 times did they put together a partnership of 50 or more - an average of one every 11.49 innings; in the last couple of years, the ratio has improved to one every 6.73 innings.
| Team | Innings | Runs | Average | 1000/ 50 stands |
| New Zealand | 316 | 8094 | 26.71 | 11/ 34 |
| Australia | 400 | 9515 | 24.65 | 10/ 46 |
| South Africa | 438 | 10,313 | 24.61 | 10/ 45 |
| Sri Lanka | 420 | 8606 | 21.46 | 11/ 26 |
| India | 424 | 8459 | 20.99 | 11/ 37 |
| Zimbabwe | 293 | 5910 | 20.73 | 6/ 23 |
| Pakistan | 426 | 8575 | 20.56 | 9/ 34 |
| England | 586 | 11,059 | 19.74 | 8/ 43 |
| West Indies | 561 | 8914 | 16.26 | 3/ 34 |
| Bangladesh | 373 | 5181 | 13.92 | 0/ 17 |
The list of top nine pairs for the last four wickets features two from England, with Swann figuring in both. His average partnership with Anderson is worth 42.20, and in five innings they've gone past 50 twice; with Broad, the average is 37.50, with one century stand - 108 against Australia at Headingley - in six innings. Swann also averages 34.50 with Paul Collingwood, another batsman who has been instrumental in giving England's middle and lower orders some backbone.
The South African duo of AB de Villiers and Paul Harris is one of only two such pairs to average more than 50 - Bangladesh's Mahmudullah and Mushfiqur Rahim make the list thanks to their superb performances in the Chittagong Test against India. Brendon McCullum and Daniel Vettori miss the mark by just three runs, though they have four 50-plus stands to their credit. Pakistan and Sri Lanka are the only teams who don't have a single representative in the list.
| Pair | Innings | Runs | Average stand | 100/ 50 stands |
| AB de Villiers - Paul Harris | 6 | 287 | 57.40 | 0/ 2 |
| Mahmudullah - Mushfiqur Rahim | 5 | 226 | 56.50 | 1/ 1 |
| Brendon McCullum - Daniel Vettori | 12 | 597 | 49.75 | 2/ 2 |
| MS Dhoni - Harbhajan Singh | 7 | 313 | 44.71 | 1/ 2 |
| Michael Clarke - Mitchell Johnson | 7 | 298 | 42.57 | 1/ 1 |
| James Anderson - Graeme Swann | 5 | 211 | 42.20 | 1/ 1 |
| Jacob Oram - Daniel Vettori | 6 | 245 | 40.83 | 1/ 1 |
| Shivnarine Chanderpaul - Jerome Taylor | 7 | 263 | 37.57 | 1/ 0 |
| Stuart Broad - Graeme Swann | 6 | 225 | 37.50 | 1/ 0 |
In the last two years, only Vettori - among batsmen who've batted at No. 8 or lower - has a higher average than Swann. The difference in average is significant, but it's well known that Vettori is clearly capable of batting higher in the order, especially in a line-up as brittle as New Zealand's. Swann is the only batsman apart from Vettori to average more than 30 in a list which also hass Broad at No. 4, thus giving England two representatives in the top four. Graham Onions doesn't figure in this list, but he has done his bit to boost England's tail: he has been dismissed just three times in 97 deliveries, an average of 32 balls per dismissal.
| Batsman | Innings | Runs | Average | 100s/ 50s |
| Daniel Vettori | 32 | 1148 | 42.51 | 2/ 6 |
| Graeme Swann | 21 | 525 | 32.81 | 0/ 4 |
| Mitchell Johnson | 38 | 878 | 28.32 | 1/ 4 |
| Stuart Broad | 33 | 768 | 27.42 | 0/ 5 |
| Nathan Hauritz | 15 | 227 | 20.63 | 0/ 1 |
| Harbhajan Singh | 28 | 532 | 20.46 | 0/ 5 |
| Jerome Taylor | 22 | 403 | 20.15 | 1/ 1 |
| Brett Lee | 22 | 338 | 18.77 | 0/ 2 |
The advent of Swann and Broad is all the more surprising since England have seldom had competent batsmen lower down the order. Among England's batsmen who have batted at No. 8 or lower in at least 20 innings, Swann's batting average is the highest in England's Test history. What's more, Broad is in second place, marginally ahead of Jack Russell. Chris Lewis is next, after which the next six all played their cricket before 1970.
During the period between 1970 and 2007, only five England batsmen batting in the last four slots (with the 20-innings qualification) averaged more than 20.
| Batsman | Innings | Runs | Average | 100s/ 50s |
| Graeme Swann | 21 | 525 | 32.81 | 0/ 4 |
| Stuart Broad | 34 | 770 | 26.55 | 0/ 5 |
| Jack Russell | 25 | 482 | 25.36 | 0/ 1 |
| Chris Lewis | 30 | 661 | 24.48 | 0/ 3 |
| Wilfred Rhodes | 33 | 411 | 24.17 | 0/ 0 |
| David Allen | 47 | 805 | 23.67 | 0/ 4 |
| Walter Robins | 22 | 440 | 23.15 | 0/ 4 |
| Maurice Tate | 38 | 820 | 22.77 | 0/ 4 |
| Godfrey Evans | 56 | 1062 | 22.59 | 1/ 2 |
| Hedley Verity | 40 | 620 | 22.14 | 0/ 3 |
And finally, a comparison between Swann and Monty Panesar shows just how much more Swann has brought to the table over the last two years. Since the beginning of 2008, both have played 16 Tests, but Swann has taken 24 more wickets at a better average and strike rate, and has scored almost nine times as many runs. These numbers indicate, in a nutshell, just how difficult it will be for Panesar to force his way back into the side. With Swann and Broad handling the allrounder's role so effectively, England's selectors will hardly be in a hurry to change this combination.
| Player | Tests | Runs | Average | Wickets | Averag | Strike rate | MoM awards |
| Graeme Swann | 16 | 525 | 32.81 | 69 | 30.69 | 60.9 | 3 |
| Monty Panesar | 16 | 59 | 3.68 | 45 | 37.26 | 80.8 | 1 |
Comments
Post a Comment